Good price  online

products details

Home > Products >
Serrated Finned tube
>
ASTM A312 TP304H Serrated Fin Tubes,The Corrosion-Resistant Solution for Extreme Environment Waste Heat Recovery

ASTM A312 TP304H Serrated Fin Tubes,The Corrosion-Resistant Solution for Extreme Environment Waste Heat Recovery

Brand Name: YUHONG
Model Number: ASTM A312 TP304H Serrated Fin Tubes
MOQ: 200~500 KGS
Price: Negotiable
Payment Terms: T/T,L/C
Supply Ability: According to Clients' requirements
Detail Information
Place of Origin:
China
Certification:
ABS, BV, DNV, CCS, LR
Product Name:
Serrated Finned Tube / Serrated Spiral High Frequency Welding Finned Tube
Base Tube Specification&Material:
ASTM A312 TP304H
Fin Material:
SS304H
Fin Height:
0.375″ To 1.25″
Fin Segment Width:
5/32″ Or 5/16″
Fin Thickness:
20ga (.035″) To 16ga (.060″)
Fin Pitch:
1 To 7 Fins Per Inch
Base Tube O.D.:
1.00″ To 12.75″ Outside Diameter
Applicatin:
Heat Exchangers, Air Preheaters, Boilers, And Reactors
Packaging Details:
Ply-wooden Cases with Steel Frames and Pipe's both ends with plastic caps
Supply Ability:
According to Clients' requirements
Highlight:

ASTM A312 TP304H serrated fin tubes

,

corrosion-resistant serrated fin tubes

,

waste heat recovery finned tubes

Product Description

Product Overview

ASTM A312 TP304H serrated fin tubes represent the optimal technical solution for waste heat recovery applications in highly corrosive environments or temperatures exceeding 650°C. While the initial investment is higher than carbon steel alternatives, the significantly extended service life, reduced maintenance requirements, and consistent performance in challenging conditions deliver superior lifecycle economics.

The combination of TP304H's inherent corrosion resistance, high-temperature stability, and the heat transfer enhancement provided by the serrated fin design creates a solution that is not merely "better" but often the only technically viable option for recovering energy from corrosive or high-temperature industrial exhaust streams. In applications such as waste incineration, biomass energy, and chemical processing, where conventional materials fail rapidly, TP304H serrated fin tubes transform previously unviable heat recovery opportunities into reliable, long-term energy savings.


I. Why ASTM A312 TP304H is Essential: Material Characteristics for Extreme Conditions

ASTM A312 TP304H represents a high-temperature variant of the widely used 304 stainless steel, specifically engineered for elevated temperature service with enhanced creep strength. Unlike standard 304 stainless steel (with carbon content limited to 0.08% maximum), TP304H maintains a controlled carbon content of 0.04–0.10%, which significantly improves its high-temperature mechanical properties while retaining excellent corrosion resistance.

Key Material Properties:

  • Chemical Composition: 18% Cr, 8% Ni, 0.04–0.10% C, with minimal impurities (P≤0.045%, S≤0.030%)
  • High-Temperature Performance:
    • Maximum continuous service temperature: 870°C (1600°F)
    • 10⁵-hour creep rupture strength at 700°C: 75 MPa
    • Oxidation resistance up to 925°C in intermittent service
  • Corrosion Resistance:
    • Excellent resistance to organic acids, chromic acid, nitric acid
    • Superior chloride stress corrosion cracking resistance compared to 304L (but still limited above 60°C in high-chloride environments)
    • Resistant to pitting and crevice corrosion in most industrial atmospheres

The elevated carbon content in TP304H (compared to 304L) provides critical advantages in high-temperature applications:

  • Formation of chromium carbides at grain boundaries is minimized through proper heat treatment
  • Higher carbon content improves creep strength without significantly compromising corrosion resistance
  • Maintains ductility and toughness after long-term high-temperature exposure

Unlike carbon steel or low-alloy steel options (like A192 or T22), TP304H does not suffer from catastrophic oxidation at elevated temperatures—its chromium content forms a self-healing Cr₂O₃ protective layer that prevents further oxidation. This characteristic makes it indispensable in environments where oxidation resistance is paramount.



II. Physical Durability: Performance in Extreme Environments

Waste heat recovery systems operating in corrosive or high-temperature environments face multiple challenges that TP304H serrated fin tubes are specifically designed to address:

Challenge TP304H Serrated Fin Tube Performance Technical Explanation
High-Temperature Oxidation ★★★★★ Forms protective Cr₂O₃ layer; oxidation rate <0.05 mm/year at 800°C
Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking ★★★☆ Superior to 304L but still limited; requires temperature control below 60°C in high-chloride environments
Acid Dew Point Corrosion ★★★★☆ Highly resistant to sulfuric, nitric, and organic acids below 20% concentration
Creep Resistance ★★★☆ 75 MPa 10⁵h creep strength at 700°C (less than T22 at lower temperatures but better at >650°C)
Thermal Fatigue ★★★★ High ductility (elongation >40%) accommodates thermal cycling stresses

Engineering Enhancement Measures:

  • Controlled Welding Parameters: Precise HF welding settings to avoid sensitization (425–815°C range)
  • Post-Weld Annealing: 1050°C solution treatment followed by rapid quenching to restore corrosion resistance
  • Surface Passivation: Nitric acid treatment to enhance the protective oxide layer
  • Temperature Monitoring: Critical to maintain wall temperatures above acid dew point but below sensitization range

Conclusion:
In highly corrosive environments (chlorides, acids, salts) or temperatures exceeding 650°C, TP304H serrated fin tubes can operate safely for 10–15 years with proper design, whereas carbon steel alternatives would fail within months. The material's self-protecting oxide layer and austenitic structure provide unmatched durability in these extreme conditions.



III. Serrated Fin Advantages on Stainless Steel Base: Precision Engineering for Maximum Efficiency

While the serrated fin design principle remains consistent across materials, its implementation on TP304H stainless steel presents unique advantages and considerations in extreme environments:

Enhancement Mechanism Special Significance for TP304H Measured Effect
Boundary Layer Disruption Particularly effective in viscous, high-temperature flue gases Heat transfer coefficient increased by 30–45% (slightly less than on carbon steel due to higher base thermal conductivity)
Vortex Anti-Fouling Design Critical in sticky, corrosive environments where ash adhesion is problematic Fouling cycle extended by 2× (from 30 to 60 days in waste incineration applications)
Metallurgical Bond via HFW Requires precise control to avoid sensitization during welding When properly executed, maintains 95% of base material corrosion resistance
Thermal Stress Distribution Austenitic structure accommodates thermal expansion better than ferritic steels Reduces thermal fatigue cracking risk by 60% compared to carbon steel alternatives

Technical Considerations for Stainless Steel HFW:

  • Higher electrical resistivity requires adjusted HF welding parameters
  • Lower thermal conductivity necessitates precise heat input control
  • Risk of sensitization (chromium carbide precipitation) between 425–815°C requires post-weld solution annealing
  • Surface preparation is critical to ensure proper oxide layer removal before welding


IV. Primary Application Areas: Where TP304H Serrated Tubes Are Indispensable

1. Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (MSWI) Systems

  • Critical Challenge: Flue gas contains high concentrations of HCl (5,000–10,000 ppm), SO₂, and heavy metals at 400–550°C
  • TP304H Advantage:
    • Resists chlorine-induced corrosion where carbon steel would fail within weeks
    • Maintains structural integrity despite frequent thermal cycling during waste composition changes
    • Serrated design prevents sticky ash deposition common in MSWI systems
  • Performance Data:
    • A European waste-to-energy plant reported 8 years of operation without tube replacement
    • Acid dew point corrosion eliminated by maintaining wall temperatures >140°C
    • Heat recovery efficiency increased by 32% compared to carbon steel alternatives

2. Biomass and Waste-to-Energy Plants

  • Critical Challenge: High alkali metal content (K, Na) in flue gas causes severe corrosion and fouling
  • TP304H Advantage:
    • Superior resistance to alkali-induced corrosion compared to carbon steel
    • Serrated fins disrupt the deposition of sticky potassium chloride and sulfate compounds
    • Higher temperature capability allows operation in critical 450–550°C range where corrosion is most severe
  • Performance Data:
    • A Scandinavian biomass plant achieved 7.2 years of continuous operation
    • Maintenance intervals extended from 6 to 18 months compared to T22 alternatives

3. Chemical and Petrochemical Process Heaters

  • Critical Challenge: Processing streams containing sulfur compounds, chlorides, and organic acids
  • TP304H Advantage:
    • Resists corrosion from sulfuric acid dew point (as low as 100°C)
    • Maintains integrity in mixed acid environments where carbon steel would rapidly degrade
    • Serrated design compensates for lower heat transfer coefficient compared to carbon steel
  • Performance Data:
    • A Gulf Coast refinery reported 12 years of service in a sulfur recovery unit economizer
    • No significant wall thinning observed after 10 years of operation


V. Comparative Advantages: Why Choose TP304H Over Alternatives?

Dimension TP304H Performance Value Proposition
Corrosion Resistance Exceptional in acidic, chloride-containing environments Eliminates frequent tube replacement in corrosive applications
High-Temperature Capability Stable up to 870°C continuous service Suitable for applications exceeding T22's temperature limits
Long-Term Reliability Service life of 10–15 years in properly designed systems Reduces maintenance costs and unplanned downtime
Economic Efficiency Higher initial cost but lower lifetime cost in corrosive environments Payback period of 3–5 years through reduced maintenance and extended equipment life
Versatility Suitable for both high-temperature and highly corrosive applications One solution for multiple challenging environments

Economic Analysis (60 MW Waste-to-Energy Plant):

  • Initial investment: 40% higher than carbon steel alternative
  • Annual maintenance cost: 65% lower due to reduced cleaning and replacement needs
  • Service life: 10+ years vs. 2–3 years for carbon steel in same environment
  • Net present value (10-year horizon): 2.3× higher than carbon steel alternative


VI. Implementation Guidelines: Ensuring Optimal Performance

Critical Design Considerations:

  • Temperature Control: Maintain wall temperatures above acid dew point but below sensitization range (425–815°C)
  • Welding Quality Control: Implement strict procedures to prevent sensitization during manufacturing
  • Material Grading: Use TP304H only where necessary; transition to more economical materials in less severe sections
  • Cleaning Strategy: Design appropriate soot-blowing system to match the specific fouling characteristics
  • Corrosion Monitoring: Install probes to track wall thickness and corrosion rates in critical areas

Quality Assurance Requirements:

  • ASTM A312 compliance verification
  • Intergranular corrosion testing per ASTM A262 Practice E
  • 100% eddy current testing of weld zones
  • Solution annealing verification through microstructure examination